[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710060031130.2398@nanos>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 00:41:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] x86/cpuid: Add generic table for cpuid
dependencies
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Andi Kleen wrote:
> +/*
> + * Table of CPUID features that depend on others.
> + *
> + * This only includes dependencies that can be usefully disabled, not
> + * features part of the base set (like FPU).
> + */
> +const static struct cpuid_dep cpuid_deps[] = {
> + { X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> + { X86_FEATURE_XSAVEC, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> + { X86_FEATURE_XSAVES, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> + { X86_FEATURE_AVX, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> + { X86_FEATURE_AVX512F, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
This looks redundant. AVX512F depends on AVX which itself depends on XSAVE.
> + { X86_FEATURE_PKU, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> + { X86_FEATURE_MPX, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> + { X86_FEATURE_XGETBV1, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> + { X86_FEATURE_XMM2, X86_FEATURE_XMM },
XMM has no dependency?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists