[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171005230813.GA5109@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:08:13 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] x86/cpuid: Add generic table for cpuid
dependencies
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 12:41:56AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Table of CPUID features that depend on others.
> > + *
> > + * This only includes dependencies that can be usefully disabled, not
> > + * features part of the base set (like FPU).
> > + */
> > +const static struct cpuid_dep cpuid_deps[] = {
> > + { X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> > + { X86_FEATURE_XSAVEC, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> > + { X86_FEATURE_XSAVES, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> > + { X86_FEATURE_AVX, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> > + { X86_FEATURE_AVX512F, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
>
> This looks redundant. AVX512F depends on AVX which itself depends on XSAVE.
True.
>
> > + { X86_FEATURE_PKU, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> > + { X86_FEATURE_MPX, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> > + { X86_FEATURE_XGETBV1, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE },
> > + { X86_FEATURE_XMM2, X86_FEATURE_XMM },
>
> XMM has no dependency?
Only FXSAVE, I'll add that.
Thanks,
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists