linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited private command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171005142325.5a407f18@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Oct 2017 14:23:46 +1000
From:   Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
        Maged Michael <maged.michael@...il.com>, gromer@...gle.com,
        Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited
 private command

On Wed,  4 Oct 2017 14:37:53 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> 
> Provide a new command allowing processes to register their intent to use
> the private expedited command.
> 
> This allows PowerPC to skip the full memory barrier in switch_mm(), and
> only issue the barrier when scheduling into a task belonging to a
> process that has registered to use expedited private.
> 
> Processes are now required to register before using
> MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED, otherwise that command returns EPERM.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Use test_ti_thread_flag(next, ...) instead of test_thread_flag() in
>   powerpc membarrier_arch_sched_in(), given that we want to specifically
>   check the next thread state.
> - Add missing ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_HOOKS in Kconfig.
> - Use task_thread_info() to pass thread_info from task to
>   *_ti_thread_flag().
> 
> Changes since v2:
> - Move membarrier_arch_sched_in() call to finish_task_switch().
> - Check for NULL t->mm in membarrier_arch_fork().
> - Use membarrier_sched_in() in generic code, which invokes the
>   arch-specific membarrier_arch_sched_in(). This fixes allnoconfig
>   build on PowerPC.
> - Move asm/membarrier.h include under CONFIG_MEMBARRIER, fixing
>   allnoconfig build on PowerPC.
> - Build and runtime tested on PowerPC.
> 
> Changes since v3:
> - Simply rely on copy_mm() to copy the membarrier_private_expedited mm
>   field on fork.
> - powerpc: test thread flag instead of reading
>   membarrier_private_expedited in membarrier_arch_fork().
> - powerpc: skip memory barrier in membarrier_arch_sched_in() if coming
>   from kernel thread, since mmdrop() implies a full barrier.
> - Set membarrier_private_expedited to 1 only after arch registration
>   code, thus eliminating a race where concurrent commands could succeed
>   when they should fail if issued concurrently with process
>   registration.
> - Use READ_ONCE() for membarrier_private_expedited field access in
>   membarrier_private_expedited. Matches WRITE_ONCE() performed in
>   process registration.
> 
> Changes since v4:
> - Move powerpc hook from sched_in() to switch_mm(), based on feedback
>   from Nicholas Piggin.

For now, the powerpc approach is okay by me. I plan to test
others (e.g., taking runqueue locks) on larger systems, but that can
be sent as an incremental patch at a later time.

The main thing I would like is for people to review the userspace API.


> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> index 3a19c253bdb1..4af1b719c65f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> @@ -205,4 +205,54 @@ static inline void memalloc_noreclaim_restore(unsigned int flags)
>  	current->flags = (current->flags & ~PF_MEMALLOC) | flags;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMBARRIER
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_HOOKS
> +#include <asm/membarrier.h>
> +#else
> +static inline void membarrier_arch_switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
> +		struct mm_struct *next, struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +}

This is no longer required in architecture independent code, is it?