lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:38:29 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: Consolidate page table accounting

On 10/04/2017 10:06 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> This patch switches page table accounting to single counter from
> three -- nr_ptes, nr_pmds and nr_puds.
> 
> mm->pgtables_bytes is now used to account page table levels. We use
> bytes, because page table size for different levels of page table tree
> may be different.
> 
> The change has user-visible effect: we don't have VmPMD and VmPUD
> reported in /proc/[pid]/status. Not sure if anybody uses them.
> (As alternative, we can always report 0 kB for them.)
> 
> OOM-killer report is also slightly changed: we now report pgtables_bytes
> instead of nr_ptes, nr_pmd, nr_puds.

Could you please mention the motivation of doing this ? Why we are
consolidating the counters which also changes /proc/ interface as
well as OOM report ? What is the benefit ?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ