lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1710051118440.14384@jbgna.fhfr.qr>
Date:   Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:18:58 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
cc:     linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dtor@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: hid-multitouch: forward MSC_TIMESTAMP

On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Nicolas Boichat wrote:

> Computes and forwards the device timestamp according to the
> specification.
> 
> Many devices use a 16-bit timestamp field, with a resolution
> of 100us, therefore rolling around very frequently (every
> 6.5 seconds). To make sure there is no ambiguity, the
> timestamp reported to the input stack reset to 0 whenever
> the time between 2 received events is greater than
> MAX_TIMESTAMP_INTERVAL (1 second).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
> ---
> 
> Inspired from Benjamin Tissoires's patch here:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1742181/, and changing the
> logic to resynchronize the timestamps to use received time
> instead of a potentially more fragile difference between
> the 2 deltas.

Applied to for-4.15/multitouch.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ