[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171005101048.qa62lqk6gjfz6azt@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:10:48 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: Consolidate page table accounting
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:38:29AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 10/04/2017 10:06 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > This patch switches page table accounting to single counter from
> > three -- nr_ptes, nr_pmds and nr_puds.
> >
> > mm->pgtables_bytes is now used to account page table levels. We use
> > bytes, because page table size for different levels of page table tree
> > may be different.
> >
> > The change has user-visible effect: we don't have VmPMD and VmPUD
> > reported in /proc/[pid]/status. Not sure if anybody uses them.
> > (As alternative, we can always report 0 kB for them.)
> >
> > OOM-killer report is also slightly changed: we now report pgtables_bytes
> > instead of nr_ptes, nr_pmd, nr_puds.
>
> Could you please mention the motivation of doing this ? Why we are
> consolidating the counters which also changes /proc/ interface as
> well as OOM report ? What is the benefit ?
Sure, I'll update description.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists