linux-kernel - [BUG] fs/super: a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <06badf5e-292d-ef63-7499-6888dec1b9b0@163.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2017 16:59:18 +0800
From:   Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>
To:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, torbjorn.lindh@...ta.se,
        rgooch@...f.csiro.au
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [BUG] fs/super: a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in put_super

According to fs/super.c, the kernel may sleep under a spinlock.
The function call path is:
put_super (acquire the spinlock)
   __put_super
     destroy_super
       list_lru_destroy
         list_lru_unregister
           mutex_lock --> may sleep
         memcg_get_cache_ids
           down_read --> may sleep

This bug is found by my static analysis tool and my code review.

Thanks,
Jia-Ju Bai