[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171006083711.328461629@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:53:26 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@...il.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 38/50] netfilter: nfnl_cthelper: fix incorrect helper->expect_class_max
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit ae5c682113f9f94cc5e76f92cf041ee624c173ee ]
The helper->expect_class_max must be set to the total number of
expect_policy minus 1, since we will use the statement "if (class >
helper->expect_class_max)" to validate the CTA_EXPECT_CLASS attr in
ctnetlink_alloc_expect.
So for compatibility, set the helper->expect_class_max to the
NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM attr's value minus 1.
Also: it's invalid when the NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM attr's value is zero.
1. this will result "expect_policy = kzalloc(0, GFP_KERNEL);";
2. we cannot set the helper->expect_class_max to a proper value.
So if nla_get_be32(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM]) is zero, report -EINVAL to
the userspace.
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ nfnl_cthelper_parse_expect_policy(struct
int i, ret;
struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy *expect_policy;
struct nlattr *tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_MAX+1];
+ unsigned int class_max;
ret = nla_parse_nested(tb, NFCTH_POLICY_SET_MAX, attr,
nfnl_cthelper_expect_policy_set);
@@ -170,19 +171,18 @@ nfnl_cthelper_parse_expect_policy(struct
if (!tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM])
return -EINVAL;
- helper->expect_class_max =
- ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM]));
-
- if (helper->expect_class_max != 0 &&
- helper->expect_class_max > NF_CT_MAX_EXPECT_CLASSES)
+ class_max = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM]));
+ if (class_max == 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (class_max > NF_CT_MAX_EXPECT_CLASSES)
return -EOVERFLOW;
expect_policy = kzalloc(sizeof(struct nf_conntrack_expect_policy) *
- helper->expect_class_max, GFP_KERNEL);
+ class_max, GFP_KERNEL);
if (expect_policy == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
- for (i=0; i<helper->expect_class_max; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < class_max; i++) {
if (!tb[NFCTH_POLICY_SET+i])
goto err;
@@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ nfnl_cthelper_parse_expect_policy(struct
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
}
+
+ helper->expect_class_max = class_max - 1;
helper->expect_policy = expect_policy;
return 0;
err:
@@ -377,10 +379,10 @@ nfnl_cthelper_dump_policy(struct sk_buff
goto nla_put_failure;
if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFCTH_POLICY_SET_NUM,
- htonl(helper->expect_class_max)))
+ htonl(helper->expect_class_max + 1)))
goto nla_put_failure;
- for (i=0; i<helper->expect_class_max; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < helper->expect_class_max + 1; i++) {
nest_parms2 = nla_nest_start(skb,
(NFCTH_POLICY_SET+i) | NLA_F_NESTED);
if (nest_parms2 == NULL)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists