linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bnxt_en: don't consider building bnxt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACKFLikAM3sfHYA-VnNbHWN_aYaG92MwpHjhN3dzhyONDaoTuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2017 18:01:57 -0700
From:   Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To:     Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>
Cc:     Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bnxt_en: don't consider building bnxt_tc.o
 if option not enabled

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com> wrote:
> Instead of zeroing out bnxt_tc.c with a #ifdef foo, instead don't compile
> the file when the option is not enabled. Now make and the preprocessor do
> not have to waste time compiling a no-op.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>

Acked-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>