[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7086a857-f90c-4616-bbe8-f7696f21626c@default>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 20:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
To: <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<john.stultz@...aro.org>, <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Cc: Srinivas REDDY Eeda <srinivas.eeda@...cle.com>,
Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] timers: avoid an unnecessory iteration in __run_timers()
When we know next expired timer is later than current jiffies, we don't need to
call collect_expired_timers() again checking empty hlists.
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index f2674a0..02be824 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1560,8 +1560,7 @@ static int collect_expired_timers(struct timer_base *base,
* jiffies, otherwise forward to the next expiry time:
*/
if (time_after(next, jiffies)) {
- /* The call site will increment clock! */
- base->clk = jiffies - 1;
+ base->clk = jiffies;
return 0;
}
base->clk = next;
--
1.7.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists