[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710171731320.19068@hypnos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:33:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
cc: sboyd@...eaurora.org, tglx@...utronix.de, john.stultz@...aro.org,
Srinivas REDDY Eeda <srinivas.eeda@...cle.com>,
Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] timers: avoid an unnecessory iteration in
__run_timers()
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> When we know next expired timer is later than current jiffies, we don't need to
> call collect_expired_timers() again checking empty hlists.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Thanks,
Anna-Maria
> ---
> kernel/time/timer.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
> index f2674a0..02be824 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
> @@ -1560,8 +1560,7 @@ static int collect_expired_timers(struct timer_base *base,
> * jiffies, otherwise forward to the next expiry time:
> */
> if (time_after(next, jiffies)) {
> - /* The call site will increment clock! */
> - base->clk = jiffies - 1;
> + base->clk = jiffies;
> return 0;
> }
> base->clk = next;
> --
> 1.7.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists