linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 8/8] blk-mq: improve bio merge from blk-mq sw queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171009042835.GA19029@ming.t460p>
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2017 12:28:37 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
        Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        Tom Nguyen <tom81094@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 8/8] blk-mq: improve bio merge from blk-mq sw queue

On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:21:43AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This looks generally good to me, but I really worry about the impact
> on very high iops devices.  Did you try this e.g. for random reads
> from unallocated blocks on an enterprise NVMe SSD?

Looks no such impact, please see the following data
in the fio test(libaio, direct, bs=4k, 64jobs, randread, none scheduler)

[root@...rageqe-62 results]# ../parse_fio 4.14.0-rc2.no_blk_mq_perf+-nvme-64jobs-mq-none.log 4.14.0-rc2.BLK_MQ_PERF_V5+-nvme-64jobs-mq-none.log
---------------------------------------
 IOPS(K)  |    NONE     |    NONE
---------------------------------------
randread  |      650.98 |      653.15
---------------------------------------

OR:

If you worry about this impact, can we simply disable merge on NVMe
for none scheduler? It is basically impossible to merge NVMe's
request/bio when none is used, but it can be doable in case of kyber
scheduler.

-- 
Ming