[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171009043650.GB19029@ming.t460p>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 12:36:51 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Tom Nguyen <tom81094@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/7] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_dequeue_from_ctx()
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:01:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 06:27:17PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > This function is introduced for dequeuing request
> > from sw queue so that we can dispatch it in
> > scheduler's way.
> >
> > More importantly, some SCSI devices may set
> > q->queue_depth, which is a per-request_queue limit,
> > and applied on pending I/O from all hctxs. This
> > function is introduced for avoiding to dequeue too
> > many requests from sw queue when ->dispatch isn't
> > flushed completely.
>
> Weird commit log formatting, please use your 70+ chacters to format the
> text.
OK.
>
> > @@ -882,6 +882,44 @@ void blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct list_head *list)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs);
> >
> > +struct dispatch_rq_data {
> > + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> > + struct request *rq;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static bool dispatch_rq_from_ctx(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
>
> Overly long line.
>
> But except for that this looks ok to me except for the fact that you
> just add an unused function.
OK
--
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists