linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add Paul Mackerras as maintainer for KVM/powerpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:56:15 +0200
From:   Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To:     Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
        Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@...escale.com>,
        Bharat Bhushan <Bharat.Bhushan@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add Paul Mackerras as maintainer for
 KVM/powerpc

On 09.10.2017 16:43, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09.10.17 16:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 09/10/2017 16:34, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> Paul is handling almost all of the powerpc related KVM patches nowadays,
>>> so he should be mentioned in the MAINTAINERS file accordingly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 2d3d750..177ffde 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -7571,6 +7571,7 @@ F:	arch/mips/include/asm/kvm*
>>>  F:	arch/mips/kvm/
>>>  
>>>  KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR POWERPC (KVM/powerpc)
>>> +M:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>
>>>  M:	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.com>
>>>  L:	kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org
>>>  W:	http://www.linux-kvm.org/
>>>
>>
>> Queued, replacing Alex too.  What's the state of BookE?
> 
> Orphaned? :)
> 
> It's a dead architecture anyways
Do you know whether anybody is still using it? ... if not, maybe it's
time to remove the code from the kernel?

 Thomas