linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] mmc: mediatek: make hs400_tune

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:58:54 +0200
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        yong mao <yong.mao@...iatek.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Phong LE <ple@...libre.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        srv_heupstream@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] mmc: mediatek: make hs400_tune_response only for
 mt8173



On 10/09/2017 01:35 PM, Chaotian Jing wrote:
> the origin design of hs400_tune_response is for mt8173 because of
> mt8173 has a special design. for doing that, we add a new member
> "compatible", by now it's only for mt8173.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 8 ++++++--
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> index 643c795..e8f8ad9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ struct msdc_delay_phase {
>   struct msdc_host {
>   	struct device *dev;
>   	const struct mtk_mmc_compatible *dev_comp;
> +	const char *compatible;
>   	struct mmc_host *mmc;	/* mmc structure */
>   	int cmd_rsp;
>   
> @@ -666,7 +667,8 @@ static void msdc_set_mclk(struct msdc_host *host, unsigned char timing, u32 hz)
>   		       host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE);
>   	}
>   
> -	if (timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400)
> +	if (timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400 &&
> +	    !strcmp(host->compatible, "mediatek,mt8173-mmc"))

You can add another value to mtk_mmc_compatible as you did in all the following 
patches.

Regards,
Matthias

>   		sdr_set_field(host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE,
>   			      MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRRDLY,
>   			      host->hs400_cmd_int_delay);
> @@ -1594,7 +1596,8 @@ static int msdc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>   	struct msdc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	if (host->hs400_mode)
> +	if (host->hs400_mode &&
> +	    !strcmp(host->compatible, "mediatek,mt8173-mmc"))
>   		ret = hs400_tune_response(mmc, opcode);
>   	else
>   		ret = msdc_tune_response(mmc, opcode);
> @@ -1745,6 +1748,7 @@ static int msdc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   
>   	host->dev = &pdev->dev;
>   	host->dev_comp = of_id->data;
> +	host->compatible = of_id->compatible;
>   	host->mmc = mmc;
>   	host->src_clk_freq = clk_get_rate(host->src_clk);
>   	/* Set host parameters to mmc */
>