linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pci: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in pci_set_power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2017 20:21:43 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>, patrik.r.jakobsson@...il.com,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        forest@...ttletooquiet.net,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        simon@...anor.nu, scott@...heina.com, tvboxspy@...il.com,
        dan.a.cashman@...il.com, golubev.mikhail@...il.com,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in pci_set_power_state

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:15:17PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc Rafael, linux-pm]
>>
>> Hi Jia-Ju,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:16:20PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> > The drivers vt6655 and gma500 call pci_set_power_state under a spinlock, which may sleep.
>> > The function call paths are:
>> > gma_power_begin (acquire the spinlock) (drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/power.c)
>> >   gma_resume_pci
>> >     pci_set_power_state
>> >       __pci_start_power_transition (drivers/pci/pci.c)
>> >         msleep --> may sleep
>> >
>> > gma_power_begin (acquire the spinlock) (drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/power.c)
>> >   gma_resume_pci
>> >     pci_enable_device
>> >       pci_enable_device_flags (drivers/pci/pci.c)
>> >         do_pci_enable_device
>> >           pci_set_power_state
>> >             __pci_start_power_transition
>> >               msleep --> may sleep
>> >
>> > vt6655_suspend (acquire the spinlock) (drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c)
>> >   pci_set_power_state
>> >     __pci_start_power_transition (drivers/pci/pci.c)
>> >       msleep --> may sleep
>> >
>> > To fix these bugs, msleep is replaced with mdelay in __pci_start_power_transition
>> >
>> > These bugs are found by my static analysis tool and my code review.
>>
>> We can either
>>
>>   - change pci_set_power_state() so it can be called while holding a
>>     spinlock (as this patch does), or
>>
>>   - change the drivers so they don't hold the spinlock while calling
>>     pci_set_power_state().
>>
>> I think the latter is better because d3cold_delay is typically 100ms,
>> and that's a long time to spin with interrupts disabled.
>>
>> I assume it's easy to produce an actual failure here?  Why haven't we
>> seen bug reports about this?
>
> Sigh, could have saved myself some time if I'd read the whole thread
> before responding :)  Sorry for repeating what Greg already said!

Well, calling pci_set_power_state() with a spinlock held is a bug,
plain and simple, among other things because it may involve running
AML.  Messing up with the single delay in it simply doesn't help.

Thanks,
Rafael