[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F770038E5@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 21:34:22 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Jeremy Cline <jcline@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: x86/mce: suspicious RCU usage in 4.13.4
> here's a second attempt at a more rigorous simplification: RCU stuff is
> gone and only a single loop scans through the elements.
The dev_mce_log() changes look good now.
You can apply the axe to more bits of mce_chrdev_read() though. Like that
while (!m->finished) {
we hold the mutex, the writer of that holds the mutex ... the spin loop is going to always
time out.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists