[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171011085106.cusi65s2du3n537y@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:51:06 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel-fixes tree
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:03:00AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c: In function ‘i915_gem_evict_for_node’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c:318:31: error: implicit declaration of function ‘i915_vma_has_userfault’; did you mean ‘i915_vma_pin_count’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> if (flags & PIN_NONFAULT && i915_vma_has_userfault(vma)) {
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> i915_vma_pin_count
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 72872c99b6dbc ("drm/i915: Check PIN_NONFAULT overlaps in evict_for_node")
>
> in the drm-intel-fixes tree. I've used the tree from yesterday.
This is still present today.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists