[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171011173936.bs32lwinrjlpgccn@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:39:36 -0700
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the
drm-intel-fixes tree
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 08:51:06AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:03:00AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
> > (x86_allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.o
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c: In function ‘i915_gem_evict_for_node’:
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c:318:31: error: implicit declaration of function ‘i915_vma_has_userfault’; did you mean ‘i915_vma_pin_count’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > if (flags & PIN_NONFAULT && i915_vma_has_userfault(vma)) {
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > i915_vma_pin_count
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > 72872c99b6dbc ("drm/i915: Check PIN_NONFAULT overlaps in evict_for_node")
> >
> > in the drm-intel-fixes tree. I've used the tree from yesterday.
>
> This is still present today.
It is fixed now. Sorry for the trouble.
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists