lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:47:43 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/afs/flock and fs/locks: Fix possible sleep-in-atomic bugs in posix_lock_file

J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:

> Does that mean nobody's tested fcntl locking over afs since that change in
> 2010?

Quite feasibly not.  I've been beating kAFS into shape and I'm aware of the
lock thing.  It's on the list after getting the core server rotation working
properly since that will affect a whole bunch of code, including the locking
code.

I've more or less finished the server rotation bit.  See:

	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=afs-2-experimental

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists