linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/afs/flock and fs/locks: Fix possible sleep-in-atomic bugs in posix_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:45:00 -0400
From:   "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/afs/flock and fs/locks: Fix possible sleep-in-atomic
 bugs in posix_lock_file

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:47:43AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
> 
> > Does that mean nobody's tested fcntl locking over afs since that change in
> > 2010?
> 
> Quite feasibly not.  I've been beating kAFS into shape and I'm aware of the
> lock thing.  It's on the list after getting the core server rotation working
> properly since that will affect a whole bunch of code, including the locking
> code.
> 
> I've more or less finished the server rotation bit.  See:
> 
> 	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=afs-2-experimental

Neat!

Well, pending a real fix I suppose it's probably clearest to leave the
locking code in an obviously broken state.  Might be worth a comment
though.

--b.