lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:19:27 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Robert Richter <robert.richter@...ium.com>
Cc:     Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, mark.rutland@....com, acme@...nel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, jnair@...iumnetworks.com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, gklkml16@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] perf vendor events arm64: Add ThunderX2
 implementation defined pmu core events

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:47:30PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> Shaokun,
> 
> On 29.08.17 17:26:00, Zhangshaokun wrote:
> > On 2017/8/24 20:03, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> > > This is not a full event list, but a short list of useful events.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/mapfile.csv       | 15 ++++++
> > >  .../arm64/thunderx2/implementation-defined.json    | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/mapfile.csv
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/thunderx2/implementation-defined.json
> > > 
> > 
> > I saw you also used thunderx2 in tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/, how about John's suggestion
> > that would use vendor sub-folder?
> > Of course, appreciate maintainer's comments.
> 
> this would just add another level of subdirectories. I rather would
> prefer to have a per platform dir comparable to what is listed in
> 
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> 
> This is the same as Ganapat has implemented it.

FWIW, I agree with Zhangshaokun here that a silicon vendor subdirectory
would organise things better. It also matches what we do for
arch/arm64/boot/dts/

Will

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ