lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1507735954.22082.9.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:32:34 +0200
From:   Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>,
        richard.leitner@...data.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        axel.lin@...ics.com, ping.bai@....com, d.schultz@...tec.de,
        peng.fan@....com, van.freenix@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] nvmem: imx-ocotp: Add support for banked OTP
 addressing

On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 15:11 +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> The i.MX7S/D takes the bank address in the CTRLn.ADDR field and the data
> value in one of the DATAx {0, 1, 2, 3} register fields. The current write
> routine is based on writing the CTRLn.ADDR field and writing a single DATA
> register only.
> 
> Fixes: 0642bac7da42 ("nvmem: imx-ocotp: add write support")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>
> ---
>  drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c b/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
> index 7798571..927d525 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,10 @@
>  #define IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_CTRL_SET		0x0004
>  #define IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_CTRL_CLR		0x0008
>  #define IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_TIMING		0x0010
> -#define IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA		0x0020
> +#define IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA0		0x0020
> +#define IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA1		0x0030
> +#define IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA2		0x0040
> +#define IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA3		0x0050
>  
>  #define IMX_OCOTP_BM_CTRL_ADDR		0x0000007F
>  #define IMX_OCOTP_BM_CTRL_BUSY		0x00000100
> @@ -55,6 +58,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(ocotp_mutex);
>  
>  struct ocotp_params {
>  	unsigned int nregs;
> +	unsigned int bank_address_words;
>  };
>  
>  struct ocotp_priv {
> @@ -176,6 +180,7 @@ static int imx_ocotp_write(void *context, unsigned int offset, void *val,
>  	u32 timing = 0;
>  	u32 ctrl;
>  	u8 waddr;
> +	u8 word = 0;
>  
>  	/* allow only writing one complete OTP word at a time */
>  	if ((bytes != priv->config->word_size) ||
> @@ -228,8 +233,22 @@ static int imx_ocotp_write(void *context, unsigned int offset, void *val,
>  	 * description. Both the unlock code and address can be written in the
>  	 * same operation.
>  	 */
> -	/* OTP write/read address specifies one of 128 word address locations */
> -	waddr = offset / 4;
> +	if (priv->params->bank_address_words != 0) {
> +		/*
> +		 * In banked mode the OTP register bank goes into waddr see
> +		 * i.MX 7Solo Applications Processor Reference Manual, Rev. 0.1
> +		 * 6.4.3.1
> +		 */
> +		offset = offset / priv->config->word_size;
> +		waddr = offset / priv->params->bank_address_words;
> +		word  = offset & (priv->params->bank_address_words - 1);
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * OTP write/read address specifies one of 128 word address
> +		 * locations
> +		 */
> +		waddr = offset / 4;
> +	}

Smallest of nitpicks, here the order is:

	if (bank_address_words != 0) {
		/* MX7 */
	} else {
		/* MX6 */
	}

>  
>  	ctrl = readl(priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_CTRL);
>  	ctrl &= ~IMX_OCOTP_BM_CTRL_ADDR;
> @@ -255,8 +274,41 @@ static int imx_ocotp_write(void *context, unsigned int offset, void *val,
>  	 * shift right (with zero fill). This shifting is required to program
>  	 * the OTP serially. During the write operation, HW_OCOTP_DATA cannot be
>  	 * modified.
> +	 * Note: on i.MX7 there are four data fields to write for banked write
> +	 *       with the fuse blowing operation only taking place after data0
> +	 *	 has been written. This is why data0 must always be the last
> +	 *	 register written.
>  	 */
> -	writel(*buf, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA);
> +	if (priv->params->bank_address_words == 0) {
> +		writel(*buf, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA0);
> +	} else {
> +		switch (word) {
> +		case 0:
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA1);
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA2);
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA3);
> +			writel(*buf, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA0);
> +			break;
> +		case 1:
> +			writel(*buf, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA1);
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA2);
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA3);
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA0);
> +			break;
> +		case 2:
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA1);
> +			writel(*buf, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA2);
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA3);
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA0);
> +			break;
> +		case 3:
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA1);
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA2);
> +			writel(*buf, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA3);
> +			writel(0, priv->base + IMX_OCOTP_ADDR_DATA0);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}

But here the order is
	if (bank_address_words == 0) {
		/* MX6 */
	} else {
		/* MX7 */
	}

Reordering this for consistency would also move the MX7 code closer to
the comment.

>  
>  	/* 47.4.1.4.5
>  	 * Once complete, the controller will clear BUSY. A write request to a
> @@ -313,11 +365,11 @@ static struct nvmem_config imx_ocotp_nvmem_config = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct ocotp_params params[] = {
> -	{ .nregs = 128 },
> -	{ .nregs = 64 },
> -	{ .nregs = 128 },
> -	{ .nregs = 128 },
> -	{ .nregs = 64 },
> +	{ .nregs = 128, .bank_address_words = 0 },
> +	{ .nregs = 64,  .bank_address_words = 0 },
> +	{ .nregs = 128, .bank_address_words = 0 },
> +	{ .nregs = 128, .bank_address_words = 0 },
> +	{ .nregs = 64,  .bank_address_words = 4 },

See my comment on the last patch, I'd like to be able see which entry
corresponds to which SoC in this patch.

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>

regards
Philipp

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ