[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUtOHAb=dfy1ufGyHMERk=frhSH-BTmWgeb9zUyZvHANw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:34:39 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@...esas.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: head-common.S: Clear lr before jumping to start_kernel()
Hi Russell, Nicolas,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 01:33:25PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> [171003 11:32]:
>> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> > >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > >>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > >>> Please send it to RMK's patch system.
>> > >>
>> > >> Done (I hope so ;-)
>> > >
>> > > Failed. Retrying.
>> >
>> > Yiha ;-)
>> >
>> > http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8702/1
>>
>> This also fixes the spamming I started seeing with next-20171009:
>>
>> Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
>
> It's all nice and good that people are testing this patch, but I can't
> apply it to -rc1, nor my "misc" branch. It appears that this is due
> to patches going through other trees.
>
> Sorry, I can't take this patch.
>
> (This is the falicy about any one particular tree having rights to
> exclusively own a sub-tree in the kernel...)
So through which tree did this end up in -next?
Apparently Nicolas committed 9520b1a1b5f7a348 ("ARM: head-common.S: speed up
startup code") himself, and then asked me to send the fix for that commit to
Russell anyway?
The commit above is actually in Russell's
git://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm.git#for-next.
Russell, you did merge it yourself into for-next in commit 476242482bdee72b
("Merge branch 'xip_zdata' of http://git.linaro.org/people/nicolas.pitre/linux
into devel-testing").
My patch applies fine against your for-next branch. So I fail to see why
you can't take this patch?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists