[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171012.101659.654720543467651527.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: lucien.xin@...il.com
Cc: andreas.radke@...lbox.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/105] 4.9.55-stable review
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 23:25:10 +0800
> pls try revert:
> commit 02f7e4101092b88e57c73171174976c8a72a3eba
> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Date: Mon Oct 2 12:20:51 2017 -0700
>
> socket, bpf: fix possible use after free
>
> which caused a obvious issue in __sk_attach_prog():
> atomic_set(&fp->refcnt, 0); <----
>
> if (!sk_filter_charge(sk, fp)) {
> kfree(fp);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
Yeah this is the bad patch, my backport was buggy.
Greg, please revert.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists