[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171012191808.GA17644@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 21:18:08 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: lucien.xin@...il.com, andreas.radke@...lbox.org,
shuahkh@....samsung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/105] 4.9.55-stable review
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:16:59AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 23:25:10 +0800
>
> > pls try revert:
> > commit 02f7e4101092b88e57c73171174976c8a72a3eba
> > Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > Date: Mon Oct 2 12:20:51 2017 -0700
> >
> > socket, bpf: fix possible use after free
> >
> > which caused a obvious issue in __sk_attach_prog():
> > atomic_set(&fp->refcnt, 0); <----
> >
> > if (!sk_filter_charge(sk, fp)) {
> > kfree(fp);
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > }
>
> Yeah this is the bad patch, my backport was buggy.
>
> Greg, please revert.
No problem, I'll go revert it now.
Thanks to everyone for the good debugging and quick response.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists