[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171012185944.bip4cdk7bd4d6mpc@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 19:59:44 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Luca Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Chaya Rachel Ivgi <chaya.rachel.ivgi@...el.com>,
Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@...el.com>,
Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with
the wireless-drivers tree
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:50:51PM +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 19:35 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > With trees like this that don't coordinate with their fixes branch
> > there
> > are frequently multiple conflicts introduced so I generally report
> > things file by file without even looking at the new ones.
> Sorry for the trouble. But how do you suggest that we "coordinate our
> fixes branch"? Merge fixes into the main tree?
That'd be easiest for me! It's not of necessity a problem if the
conflicts are easy enough to resolve if you just let things get merged
in -next, it's just more an observation that that's a thing that happens
and that this is how I cope with it. Stephen may do things a bit
differently.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists