[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1507834948.5497.9.camel@coelho.fi>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 22:02:28 +0300
From: Luca Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Chaya Rachel Ivgi <chaya.rachel.ivgi@...el.com>,
Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@...el.com>,
Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with
the wireless-drivers tree
On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 19:59 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:50:51PM +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 19:35 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > With trees like this that don't coordinate with their fixes
> > > branch
> > > there
> > > are frequently multiple conflicts introduced so I generally
> > > report
> > > things file by file without even looking at the new ones.
> > Sorry for the trouble. But how do you suggest that we "coordinate
> > our
> > fixes branch"? Merge fixes into the main tree?
>
> That'd be easiest for me! It's not of necessity a problem if the
> conflicts are easy enough to resolve if you just let things get
> merged
> in -next, it's just more an observation that that's a thing that
> happens
> and that this is how I cope with it. Stephen may do things a bit
> differently.
Cool, I'll discuss this with Kalle and make sure I note these potential
conflicts early enough so everyone is aware when they're coming.
Thanks for taking over while Stephen is away! I really appreciate it,
since linux-next is a very important part of our process. :)
--
Luca.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists