linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 16/16] perf util: use correct IP mapping to find srcline for hist entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171013011959.GA32722@sejong>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:19:59 +0900
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
        Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/16] perf util: use correct IP mapping to find
 srcline for hist entry

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:22:58PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017 06:49:54 CEST Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Milian,
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 10:33:10PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> > > index 006d10a0dc96..6f3d109078a3 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> > > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ char *hist_entry__get_srcline(struct hist_entry *he)
> > > 
> > >  	if (!map)
> > >  	
> > >  		return SRCLINE_UNKNOWN;
> > > 
> > > -	return get_srcline(map->dso, map__rip_2objdump(map, he->ip),
> > > +	return get_srcline(map->dso, map__objdump_2mem(map, he->ip),
> > > 
> > >  			   he->ms.sym, true, true);
> > 
> > I'm not sure this is right.  IIRC hist_entry->ip is a relative IP so
> > it needs to be changed for objdump use.  Maybe there's some bug on
> > translating the address but it seems that the original code is
> > correct.  And this change breaks srcline for my test program (which is
> > a PIE).
> 
> Odd, I'll have to look at that. But this is imo unrelated to the rest of the 
> patch series. So maybe we skip this one and apply the others. Assuming those 
> other patches are OK by now?

Yep, for the patch 1 - 15:

  Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>

Thanks,
Namhyung