[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1507914527.13345.17.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:08:52 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "ming.lei@...hat.com" <ming.lei@...hat.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"tom81094@...il.com" <tom81094@...il.com>,
"himanshu.madhani@...ium.com" <himanshu.madhani@...ium.com>,
"paolo.valente@...aro.org" <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"oleksandr@...alenko.name" <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
"john.garry@...wei.com" <john.garry@...wei.com>,
"osandov@...com" <osandov@...com>,
"loberman@...hat.com" <loberman@...hat.com>,
"james.smart@...adcom.com" <james.smart@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] blk-mq: introduce .get_budget and .put_budget in
blk_mq_ops
On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 00:45 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 00:07 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Actually it is in hot path, for example, lpfc and qla2xx's queue depth is 3,
> >
> > Sorry but I doubt whether that is correct. More in general, I don't know any modern
> > storage HBA for which the default queue depth is so low.
>
> You can grep:
>
> [ming@...g linux]$ git grep -n cmd_per_lun ./drivers/scsi/ | grep -E "qla2xxx|lpfc"
Such a low queue depth will result in suboptimal performance for adapters
that communicate over a storage network. I think that's a bug and that both
adapters support much higher cmd_per_lun values.
(+James Smart)
James, can you explain us why commit 445cf4f4d2aa decreased LPFC_CMD_PER_LUN
from 30 to 3? Was that perhaps a workaround for a bug in a specific target
implementation?
(+Himanshu Madhani)
Himanshu, do you perhaps know whether it is safe to increase cmd_per_lun for
the qla2xxx initiator driver to the scsi_host->can_queue value?
> Even SRP/IB isn't big too, just 32.
The default value for ib_srp for cmd_per_lun is 62 but that value can be
overridden by selecting another value in /etc/default/srp_daemon.conf. Note:
a lower value is selected if after SRP login it becomes clear that the target
queue depth is lower than the cmd_per_lun value requested by the user. This
is a performance optimization and avoids that the SRP target system has to
send back BUSY responses to the initiator.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists