linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv1 00/14] omapdrm: DSI command mode panel support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:12:08 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 00/14] omapdrm: DSI command mode panel support

* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com> [171012 01:46]:
> On 29/09/17 16:26, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > Hi Tomi & Laurent,
> > 
> > ping?
> 
> I've been having quick glances at this every now and then, but I'm not
> sure what to do with the series.
> 
> We have one work item that more or less overrides everything but
> critical fixes: moving to common DRM encoder/panel drivers. Anything
> that makes that work more difficult should be postponed.
> 
> Especially patch 6 in this series most likely falls into that category,
> and might require a very different implementation with common DRM
> drivers. Also everything in panel-dsi-cm needs to be ported to a common
> DRM panel driver when can use them.
> 
> So my gut feeling is that it's best to keep this out for now, and rework
> it after Laurent gets the common DRM drivers working with omapdrm.

Laurent, got any other comments?

Maybe some of patches can be already applied to shrink down this
set a bit?

Regards,

Tony