lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:14:50 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Niklas Söderlund 
        <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: read DMATCRB instead of DMATCR for residue

Hi Morimoto-san,

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Kuninori Morimoto
<kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com> wrote:
>> > SYS/RT/Audio DMAC have both TCR/TCRB register.
>> > Its difference is transfer counter value of read (= TCR)
>> > or write (= TCRB). The relationship is like below.
>> >
>> >          TCR       TCRB
>> >  [SOURCE] -> [DMAC] -> [DESTINATION]
>> >
>> > Thus, we want to read TCRB instead of TCR for residue.
>> > Otherwise, Sound Capture has noise after PluseAudio support
>> > (= 07b7acb51d2 ("ASoC: rsnd: update pointer more accurate"))
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@...esas.com>
>> > [Kuninori: added detail information in log]
>> > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
> (snip)
>> However, shouldn't the register to use depend on the DMA direction?
>
> I think TCRB is OK for all direction,
> but yes, we can care its direction.
> I can post v2 patch, if you want.
> Geert do you want to care direction ?

Please do. I think in general the .get_residue() callback should return the
correct value for both reading and writing.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ