linux-kernel - Re: Does perf-annotate work correctly?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171016093532.GB10280@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2017 17:35:33 +0800
From:   "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jolsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Does perf-annotate work correctly?

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:30:51AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 06:15:00PM +0800, Du, Changbin wrote:
> > Hi Jiri,
> > Sorry, missed you (but get_maintainer.pl doesn't list you). Here is ealier email.
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/12/158
> > 
> > Do you think if this is a real issue?
> > 
> > btw, is their a dedicated mailist for perf? Thanks.
> 
> there's linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org for perf specific issues
> 

Good to know it. Can we add it to MAINTAINERS?

> jirka

-- 
Thanks,
Changbin Du

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)