linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171016115003.Horde.i_N7UxOt1-MfbduAkKdrWOe@gator4166.hostgator.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:50:03 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: mark expected switch fall-through


Quoting Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>:

> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:00:53AM +0000, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote:
>> Hi Silva,
>>
>>     The actual intention of the code is NOT to fall through, though  
>> current code can work correctly.
>>     Thanks for this finding. If you don't mind, I'll submit a fix  
>> patch for it with the tag 'Reported-by:' by you.
>
> I'd prefer if Gustavo would submit a patch fixing that, as he caught it
> and I'd prefer if you don't top-post on public mailing lists please.
>

I can do that. I will send a patch shortly.

Thanks
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva