linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:23:10 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: mark expected switch fall-through

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:00:53AM +0000, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote:
> Hi Silva,
> 
>     The actual intention of the code is NOT to fall through, though current code can work correctly.
>     Thanks for this finding. If you don't mind, I'll submit a fix patch for it with the tag 'Reported-by:' by you.

I'd prefer if Gustavo would submit a patch fixing that, as he caught it
and I'd prefer if you don't top-post on public mailing lists please.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.