[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0B7757C2-00D8-47E2-A30D-B7C394E12832@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 23:00:02 +0000
From: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
CC: "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org" <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/20] staging: lustre: llite: mark expected switch
fall-through
> On Oct 12, 2017, at 10:17, Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Not sure why you moved the "for mode = 0" comment to a separate line?
Not the end of the world though.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
> index 5cc2b32..55e0d03 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
> @@ -949,7 +949,9 @@ static int ll_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dchild,
>
> switch (mode & S_IFMT) {
> case 0:
> - mode |= S_IFREG; /* for mode = 0 case, fallthrough */
> + mode |= S_IFREG;
> + /* for mode = 0 case */
> + /* fall through */
> case S_IFREG:
> case S_IFCHR:
> case S_IFBLK:
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists