[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0BB0D9A1-2A0E-415F-B772-72C9C069FD18@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 23:01:52 +0000
From: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
CC: "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org" <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/20] staging: lustre: ldlm: mark expected switch
fall-through
On Oct 12, 2017, at 10:17, Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
> index f3bf238..6943987 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
> @@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ ldlm_cancel_no_wait_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, struct ldlm_lock *lock,
> case LDLM_IBITS:
> if (ns->ns_cancel && ns->ns_cancel(lock) != 0)
> break;
> + /* fall through */
> default:
> result = LDLM_POLICY_SKIP_LOCK;
> lock_res_and_lock(lock);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists