[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171018081109.mj6lzzihxmlle3b6@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:11:09 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@...enkhaos.de>, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/mm] c4c3c3c2d0: will-it-scale.per_process_ops
-61.0% regression
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 09:59:02AM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> 2017-10-14 23:43:02 ./runtest.py context_switch1 295 process 44
> tasks,processes,processes_idle,threads,threads_idle,linear
> 0,0,100,0,100,0
> 44,7723745,22.45,0,0.00,0
>
> per_process_ops = 7723745 / 44 = 175540
What is that 7723745 value? 44 too?
Please explain it in plain english and not in the context of some script
you're running. Just assume I don't know *anything* about will-it-scale.
How would you explain what those numbers are, to me?
And then consider adding boilerplate text to your reports *explaining*
what you're measuring because as it is now, people are left wondering
WTF is going on.
> percent -61% is computed by (174892 - 448554) / 448554
Ok, that I understand.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists