lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171018015902.GA10466@yexl-desktop>
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:59:02 +0800
From:   Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@...enkhaos.de>, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/mm] c4c3c3c2d0: will-it-scale.per_process_ops
 -61.0% regression

On 10/17, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 06:57:43AM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>> On 2017.10.16 at 18:06 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 3:15 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:39:17AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Greeting,
>> > >>
>> > >> FYI, we noticed a -61.0% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>> 
>> I think you are reading this wrong:
>> -61.0% regression means 61.0% improvement.
>
>Well, it has this:
>
>5b8809deb4b0a77f  c4c3c3c2d00826c88b5c02c20e
>----------------  --------------------------
>         %stddev      change         %stddev
>             \          |                \
>    448554             -61%     174892        will-it-scale.per_process_ops

Here 448554 is the average value of will-it-scale.per_process_ops for commit 5b8809deb4,
while 174892 is the average value of will-it-scale.per_process_ops for commit c4c3c3c2d0,
metric per_process_ops is calculated through raw output of will-it-scale as below
example.

2017-10-14 23:43:02 ./runtest.py context_switch1 295 process 44
tasks,processes,processes_idle,threads,threads_idle,linear
0,0,100,0,100,0
44,7723745,22.45,0,0.00,0

per_process_ops = 7723745 / 44 = 175540

percent -61% is computed by (174892 - 448554) / 448554


Thanks,
Xiaolong

>
>Xiaolong, can you first explain what those numbers mean? And how do you
>compute those 61%?
>
>Thx.
>
>-- 
>Regards/Gruss,
>    Boris.
>
>Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ