linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: use DMATCRB when xxx_TO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:46:46 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        Niklas Söderlund 
        <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: use DMATCRB when xxx_TO_MEM direction

Hi Morimoto-san,

On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 03:01:28 EEST Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Vinod, Laurent
> 
> >>> Anyway, in all case I can use TCRB in v3 patch,
> >>> and it needs abouve explanation.
> >> 
> >> If so, I think v1 is enough... ?
> >> "transfer completed count is important for all case" is no doubt... ?
> > 
> > That's correct, but I don't think the explanation was detailed and clear
> > enough. If it was Geert wouldn't have asked for a v2, and you wouldn't
> > have
> > agreed to his request :-)
> 
> OK. Let's follow Vinod's decision.
> 
> Vinod, I'm happy if you are OK on v1.
> And I'm happy to create v3 patch which includes detail reason
> which is explained by Laurent if you want.

I'd be happier with v3 :-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart