[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171019174308.GA21742@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:43:08 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: netrom: nr_in: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
Please, verify if the actual intention of the code is to fall through.
net/netrom/nr_in.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_in.c b/net/netrom/nr_in.c
index 80dbd0b..fbfdae4 100644
--- a/net/netrom/nr_in.c
+++ b/net/netrom/nr_in.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int nr_state2_machine(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
case NR_DISCREQ:
nr_write_internal(sk, NR_DISCACK);
-
+ /* fall through */
case NR_DISCACK:
nr_disconnect(sk, 0);
break;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists