Message-ID: <20171019102207.GB17450@red-moon>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:22:07 +0100
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:     Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
Cc:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        sudeep.holla@....com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, jhugo@...eaurora.org,
        wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com, Jonathan.Zhang@...ium.com,
        ahs3@...hat.com, Jayachandran.Nair@...ium.com,
        austinwc@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] ACPI/PPTT: Add Processor Properties Topology
 Table parsing

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:48:50PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> ACPI 6.2 adds a new table, which describes how processing units
> are related to each other in tree like fashion. Caches are
> also sprinkled throughout the tree and describe the properties
> of the caches in relation to other caches and processing units.
> 
> Add the code to parse the cache hierarchy and report the total
> number of levels of cache for a given core using
> acpi_find_last_cache_level() as well as fill out the individual
> cores cache information with cache_setup_acpi() once the
> cpu_cacheinfo structure has been populated by the arch specific
> code.
> 
> Further, report peers in the topology using setup_acpi_cpu_topology()
> to report a unique ID for each processing unit at a given level
> in the tree. These unique id's can then be used to match related
> processing units which exist as threads, COD (clusters
> on die), within a given package, etc.

I think this patch should be split ((1) topology (2) cache), it is doing
too much which makes it hard to review.

[...]

> +/* determine if the given node is a leaf node */
> +static int acpi_pptt_leaf_node(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> +			       struct acpi_pptt_processor *node)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_subtable_header *entry;
> +	unsigned long table_end;
> +	u32 node_entry;
> +	struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
> +
> +	table_end = (unsigned long)table_hdr + table_hdr->length;
> +	node_entry = (u32)((u8 *)node - (u8 *)table_hdr);
> +	entry = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)((u8 *)table_hdr +
> +						sizeof(struct acpi_table_pptt));
> +
> +	while (((unsigned long)entry) + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) < table_end) {
> +		cpu_node = (struct acpi_pptt_processor *)entry;
> +		if ((entry->type == ACPI_PPTT_TYPE_PROCESSOR) &&
> +		    (cpu_node->parent == node_entry))
> +			return 0;
> +		entry = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)((u8 *)entry + entry->length);
> +	}

A leaf node is a node with a valid acpi_id corresponding to an MADT
entry, right ? By the way, is this function really needed ?

> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Find the subtable entry describing the provided processor
> + */
> +static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_node(
> +	struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> +	u32 acpi_cpu_id)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_subtable_header *entry;
> +	unsigned long table_end;
> +	struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
> +
> +	table_end = (unsigned long)table_hdr + table_hdr->length;
> +	entry = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)((u8 *)table_hdr +
> +						sizeof(struct acpi_table_pptt));
> +
> +	/* find the processor structure associated with this cpuid */
> +	while (((unsigned long)entry) + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) < table_end) {
> +		cpu_node = (struct acpi_pptt_processor *)entry;
> +
> +		if ((entry->type == ACPI_PPTT_TYPE_PROCESSOR) &&
> +		    acpi_pptt_leaf_node(table_hdr, cpu_node)) {

Is the leaf node check necessary ? Or you just need to check the
ACPI Processor ID valid flag (as discussed offline) ?

> +			pr_debug("checking phy_cpu_id %d against acpi id %d\n",
> +				 acpi_cpu_id, cpu_node->acpi_processor_id);

Side note: I'd question (some of) these pr_debug() messages.

> +			if (acpi_cpu_id == cpu_node->acpi_processor_id) {
> +				/* found the correct entry */
> +				pr_debug("match found!\n");

Like this one for instance.

> +				return (struct acpi_pptt_processor *)entry;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		if (entry->length == 0) {
> +			pr_err("Invalid zero length subtable\n");
> +			break;
> +		}

This should be moved at the beginning of the loop.

> +		entry = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)
> +			((u8 *)entry + entry->length);
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Given a acpi_pptt_processor node, walk up until we identify the
> + * package that the node is associated with or we run out of levels
> + * to request.
> + */
> +static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_package_id(
> +	struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> +	struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu,
> +	int level)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_pptt_processor *prev_node;
> +
> +	while (cpu && level && !(cpu->flags & ACPI_PPTT_PHYSICAL_PACKAGE)) {

I really do not understand what ACPI_PPTT_PHYSICAL_PACKAGE means and
more importantly, how it is actually used in this code.

This function is used to get a topology id (that is just a number for
a given topology level) for a given level starting from a given leaf
node.

Why do we care at all about ACPI_PPTT_PHYSICAL_PACKAGE ?

> +		pr_debug("level %d\n", level);
> +		prev_node = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu->parent);
> +		if (prev_node == NULL)
> +			break;
> +		cpu = prev_node;
> +		level--;
> +	}
> +	return cpu;
> +}
> +
> +static int acpi_parse_pptt(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr, u32 acpi_cpu_id)
> +{
> +	int number_of_levels = 0;
> +	struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu;
> +
> +	cpu = acpi_find_processor_node(table_hdr, acpi_cpu_id);
> +	if (cpu)
> +		number_of_levels = acpi_process_node(table_hdr, cpu);
> +
> +	return number_of_levels;
> +}
> +
> +#define ACPI_6_2_CACHE_TYPE_DATA		      (0x0)
> +#define ACPI_6_2_CACHE_TYPE_INSTR		      (1<<2)
> +#define ACPI_6_2_CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED		      (1<<3)
> +#define ACPI_6_2_CACHE_POLICY_WB		      (0x0)
> +#define ACPI_6_2_CACHE_POLICY_WT		      (1<<4)
> +#define ACPI_6_2_CACHE_READ_ALLOCATE		      (0x0)
> +#define ACPI_6_2_CACHE_WRITE_ALLOCATE		      (0x01)
> +#define ACPI_6_2_CACHE_RW_ALLOCATE		      (0x02)
> +
> +static u8 acpi_cache_type(enum cache_type type)
> +{
> +	switch (type) {
> +	case CACHE_TYPE_DATA:
> +		pr_debug("Looking for data cache\n");
> +		return ACPI_6_2_CACHE_TYPE_DATA;
> +	case CACHE_TYPE_INST:
> +		pr_debug("Looking for instruction cache\n");
> +		return ACPI_6_2_CACHE_TYPE_INSTR;
> +	default:
> +		pr_debug("Unknown cache type, assume unified\n");
> +	case CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED:
> +		pr_debug("Looking for unified cache\n");
> +		return ACPI_6_2_CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/* find the ACPI node describing the cache type/level for the given CPU */
> +static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_node(
> +	struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr, u32 acpi_cpu_id,
> +	enum cache_type type, unsigned int level,
> +	struct acpi_pptt_processor **node)
> +{
> +	int total_levels = 0;
> +	struct acpi_pptt_cache *found = NULL;
> +	struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
> +	u8 acpi_type = acpi_cache_type(type);
> +
> +	pr_debug("Looking for CPU %d's level %d cache type %d\n",
> +		 acpi_cpu_id, level, acpi_type);
> +
> +	cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table_hdr, acpi_cpu_id);
> +	if (!cpu_node)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	do {
> +		found = acpi_find_cache_level(table_hdr, cpu_node, &total_levels, level, acpi_type);
> +		*node = cpu_node;
> +		cpu_node = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu_node->parent);
> +	} while ((cpu_node) && (!found));
> +
> +	return found;
> +}
> +
> +int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	u32 acpi_cpu_id;
> +	struct acpi_table_header *table;
> +	int number_of_levels = 0;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	pr_debug("Cache Setup find last level cpu=%d\n", cpu);
> +
> +	acpi_cpu_id = acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu)->uid;

This would break !ARM64.

> +	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		pr_err_once("No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate\n");
> +	} else {
> +		number_of_levels = acpi_parse_pptt(table, acpi_cpu_id);
> +		acpi_put_table(table);
> +	}
> +	pr_debug("Cache Setup find last level level=%d\n", number_of_levels);
> +
> +	return number_of_levels;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * The ACPI spec implies that the fields in the cache structures are used to
> + * extend and correct the information probed from the hardware. In the case
> + * of arm64 the CCSIDR probing has been removed because it might be incorrect.
> + */
> +static void update_cache_properties(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
> +				    struct acpi_pptt_cache *found_cache,
> +				    struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node)
> +{
> +	if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_SIZE_PROPERTY_VALID)
> +		this_leaf->size = found_cache->size;
> +	if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_LINE_SIZE_VALID)
> +		this_leaf->coherency_line_size = found_cache->line_size;
> +	if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_NUMBER_OF_SETS_VALID)
> +		this_leaf->number_of_sets = found_cache->number_of_sets;
> +	if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ASSOCIATIVITY_VALID)
> +		this_leaf->ways_of_associativity = found_cache->associativity;
> +	if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_WRITE_POLICY_VALID)
> +		switch (found_cache->attributes & ACPI_PPTT_MASK_WRITE_POLICY) {
> +		case ACPI_6_2_CACHE_POLICY_WT:
> +			this_leaf->attributes = CACHE_WRITE_THROUGH;
> +			break;
> +		case ACPI_6_2_CACHE_POLICY_WB:
> +			this_leaf->attributes = CACHE_WRITE_BACK;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			pr_err("Unknown ACPI cache policy %d\n",
> +			      found_cache->attributes & ACPI_PPTT_MASK_WRITE_POLICY);
> +		}
> +	if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ALLOCATION_TYPE_VALID)
> +		switch (found_cache->attributes & ACPI_PPTT_MASK_ALLOCATION_TYPE) {
> +		case ACPI_6_2_CACHE_READ_ALLOCATE:
> +			this_leaf->attributes |= CACHE_READ_ALLOCATE;
> +			break;
> +		case ACPI_6_2_CACHE_WRITE_ALLOCATE:
> +			this_leaf->attributes |= CACHE_WRITE_ALLOCATE;
> +			break;
> +		case ACPI_6_2_CACHE_RW_ALLOCATE:
> +			this_leaf->attributes |=
> +				CACHE_READ_ALLOCATE|CACHE_WRITE_ALLOCATE;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			pr_err("Unknown ACPI cache allocation policy %d\n",
> +			   found_cache->attributes & ACPI_PPTT_MASK_ALLOCATION_TYPE);
> +		}
> +}
> +
> +static void cache_setup_acpi_cpu(struct acpi_table_header *table,
> +				 unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_pptt_cache *found_cache;
> +	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
> +	u32 acpi_cpu_id = acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu)->uid;

Ditto.

> +	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf;
> +	unsigned int index = 0;
> +	struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node = NULL;
> +
> +	while (index < get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu)->num_leaves) {
> +		this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
> +		found_cache = acpi_find_cache_node(table, acpi_cpu_id,
> +						   this_leaf->type,
> +						   this_leaf->level,
> +						   &cpu_node);
> +		pr_debug("found = %p %p\n", found_cache, cpu_node);
> +		if (found_cache)
> +			update_cache_properties(this_leaf,
> +						found_cache,
> +						cpu_node);
> +
> +		index++;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int topology_setup_acpi_cpu(struct acpi_table_header *table,
> +				    unsigned int cpu, int level)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
> +	u32 acpi_cpu_id = acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu)->uid;

Ditto.

> +	cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table, acpi_cpu_id);
> +	if (cpu_node) {
> +		cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_package_id(table, cpu_node, level);

If level is 0 there is nothing to do here.

> +		/* Only the first level has a guaranteed id */
> +		if (level == 0)
> +			return cpu_node->acpi_processor_id;
> +		return (int)((u8 *)cpu_node - (u8 *)table);

Please explain to me the rationale behind this. To me acpi_processor_id
is as good as the cpu_node offset in the table to describe the topology
id at a given level, why special case level 0.

On top of that, with this ID scheme, we would end up with
thread/core/cluster id potentially being non-sequential values
(depending on the PPTT table layout) which should not be a problem but
we'd better check how people are using them.

> +	}
> +	pr_err_once("PPTT table found, but unable to locate core for %d\n",
> +		    cpu);
> +	return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * simply assign a ACPI cache entry to each known CPU cache entry
> + * determining which entries are shared is done later.

Add a kerneldoc style comment for an external interface.

> + */
> +int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_table_header *table;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	pr_debug("Cache Setup ACPI cpu %d\n", cpu);
> +
> +	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		pr_err_once("No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate\n");
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +	}
> +
> +	cache_setup_acpi_cpu(table, cpu);
> +	acpi_put_table(table);
> +
> +	return status;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Determine a topology unique ID for each thread/core/cluster/socket/etc.
> + * This ID can then be used to group peers.

Ditto.

> + */
> +int setup_acpi_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_table_header *table;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	int retval;
> +
> +	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		pr_err_once("No PPTT table found, cpu topology may be inaccurate\n");
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +	}
> +	retval = topology_setup_acpi_cpu(table, cpu, level);
> +	pr_debug("Topology Setup ACPI cpu %d, level %d ret = %d\n",
> +		 cpu, level, retval);
> +	acpi_put_table(table);
> +
> +	return retval;

This value is just a token - with no HW meaning whatsoever and that's
where I question the ACPI_PPTT_PHYSICAL_PACKAGE flag usage in retrieving
it, you are not looking for a packageid (which has no meaning whatsoever
anyway and I wonder why it was added to the specs at all) you are
looking for an id at a given level.

I will comment on the cache code separately - which deserves to
be in a separate patch to simplify the review, I avoided repeating
already reported review comments.

Lorenzo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists