[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1508416695.7665.13.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:38:15 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
ulrich.hecht+renesas@...il.com, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
ck.hu@...iatek.com, airlied@...ux.ie, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC resend 1/4] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: add drm binding
Hi Matthias,
On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 13:26 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> DRM subysystem and clock driver shared the same compatible mmsys.
> This stopped does not work, as only the first driver for a compatible
> gets probed. We change the comaptible to the new DRM identifier to fix
> this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> index 383183a89164..6db652463e64 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.txt.
>
> Required properties (all function blocks):
> - compatible: "mediatek,<chip>-disp-<function>", one of
> + "mediatek,<chip>-dispsys" - central component for the DRM system
> "mediatek,<chip>-disp-ovl" - overlay (4 layers, blending, csc)
> "mediatek,<chip>-disp-rdma" - read DMA / line buffer
> "mediatek,<chip>-disp-wdma" - write DMA
> @@ -71,6 +72,11 @@ mmsys: clock-controller@...00000 {
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> };
>
> +dispsys: display-system {
Could we call this node display-subsystem for consistency with i.MX and
Rockchip device trees?
With that change,
Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> + compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-dispsys";
> + mediatek,mmsys = <&mmsys>;
> +}
> +
> ovl0: ovl@...0c000 {
> compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl";
> reg = <0 0x1400c000 0 0x1000>;
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists