[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171019133849.GA2795@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:38:49 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: simplify no_printk()
On Thu 2017-10-19 19:48:15, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> 2017-10-02 23:56 GMT+09:00 Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>:
> > On Mon 2017-09-18 00:01:44, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >> Commit 069f0cd00df0 ("printk: Make the printk*once() variants return
> >> a value") surrounded the macro implementation with ({ ... }).
> >>
> >> Now, the inner do { ... } while (0); is redundant.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> >
> > Looks fine to me. The return value is slightly more visible now ;-)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> >
> > JFYI, I have pushed it into for-4.15 branch.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Petr
>
>
> A minor problem.
>
> I think "Reviewed-by: " is missing before Sergey.
Great catch! Thanks for double checking!
> I am not sure if this is too late, or not...
Just pushed a fix.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists