[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171019150921.GB24204@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:09:21 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Mark Greer <mgreer@...malcreek.com>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@...ote.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ivan Mikhaylov <ivan@...ibm.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...kerion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/5] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment()
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:23:36AM -0700, Mark Greer wrote:
> > #define MPSC_RXR_ENTRIES 32
> > -#define MPSC_RXRE_SIZE dma_get_cache_alignment()
> > +#define MPSC_RXRE_SIZE dma_get_cache_alignment(dma_dev)
>
> I would much prefer that you add a parameter to the macro to avoid forcing
> a non-flexible and non-obvious variable definition wherever it is used.
> What I mean is something like:
>
> #define MPSC_RXRE_SIZE(d) dma_get_cache_alignment(d)
>
> Similarly for all of the other macros and where they're used.
Agreed. Except for that the patch looks fine to me, though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists