[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171020023437.eani5puqd3a67lme@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 22:34:37 -0400
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
To: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH GHAK16 V5 00/10] capabilities: do not audit log
BPRM_FCAPS on set*id
On 2017-10-20 01:29, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>
> > On 2017-10-11 20:57, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > The audit subsystem is adding a BPRM_FCAPS record when auditing setuid
> > > application execution (SYSCALL execve). This is not expected as it was
> > > supposed to be limited to when the file system actually had capabilities
> > > in an extended attribute. It lists all capabilities making the event
> > > really ugly to parse what is happening. The PATH record correctly
> > > records the setuid bit and owner. Suppress the BPRM_FCAPS record on
> > > set*id.
> >
> > <crickets>
> >
> > Serge? James? Can one of you two take this via your trees since Paul
> > has backed down citing (reasonably) that it is mostly capabilities
> > patches rather than audit?
>
> Sure, I will take it.
Thanks Jaume!
> > > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/16
> > >
> > > The first to eighth patches just massage the logic to make it easier to
> > > understand. Some of them could be squashed together.
> > >
> > > The patch that resolves this issue is the ninth.
> > >
> > > It would be possible to address the original issue with a change of
> > > "!uid_eq(new->euid, root_uid) || !uid_eq(new->uid, root_uid)"
> > > to
> > > "!(uid_eq(new->euid, root_uid) || uid_eq(new->uid, root_uid))"
> > > but it took me long enough to understand this logic that I don't think
> > > I'd be doing any favours by leaving it this difficult to understand.
> > >
> > > The final patch attempts to address all the conditions that need logging
> > > based on mailing list conversations, recoginizing there is probably some
> > > duplication in the logic.
> > >
> > > Passes: (ltp 20170516)
> > > ./runltp -f syscalls -s cap
> > > ./runltp -f securebits
> > > ./runltp -f cap_bounds
> > > ./runltp -f filecaps
> > > make TARGETS=capabilities kselftest (when run locally, fails over nfs)
> > >
> > > Since this is mostly capabilities related rather than audit, could this go
> > > through the capabilites (Serge) or security (James) trees please? Thanks!
> > >
> > > v5
> > > rebase on linux-security/next 4.14-rc2
> > > added comment block header to handle_privileged_root()
> > > moved comment in handle_privileged_root()
> > > moved root_privileged() check back into handle_privileged_root()
> > >
> > > v4
> > > rebase on kees' 4.13 commoncap changes
> > > minor local func renames
> > >
> > > v3
> > > refactor into several sub-functions
> > > convert most macros to inline funcs
> > >
> > > v2
> > > use macros to clarify intent of calculations
> > > fix original logic error
> > > address additional audit logging conditions
> > >
> > > Richard Guy Briggs (10):
> > > capabilities: factor out cap_bprm_set_creds privileged root
> > > capabilities: intuitive names for cap gain status
> > > capabilities: rename has_cap to has_fcap
> > > capabilities: use root_priveleged inline to clarify logic
> > > capabilities: use intuitive names for id changes
> > > capabilities: move audit log decision to function
> > > capabilities: remove a layer of conditional logic
> > > capabilities: invert logic for clarity
> > > capabilities: fix logic for effective root or real root
> > > capabilities: audit log other surprising conditions
> > >
> > > security/commoncap.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3.1
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> > - RGB
> >
> > --
> > Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> > Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
> > Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
> > IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
> > Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
> >
>
> --
> James Morris
> <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
>
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
Powered by blists - more mailing lists