lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQU+R4Z+3xS9SjUk2i2D8Ht6uhP_pd8maguQOen1UqpgZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 21 Oct 2017 00:20:33 -0700
From:   Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:     Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc:     "kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: x86/kdump: crashkernel=X try to reserve below 896M first then
 below 4G and MAXMEM

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> wrote:
> Now crashkernel=X will fail if there's not enough memory at low region
> (below 896M) when trying to reserve large memory size.  One can use
> crashkernel=xM,high to reserve it at high region (>4G) but it is more
> convinient to improve crashkernel=X to:
>
>  - First try to reserve X below 896M (for being compatible with old
>    kexec-tools).
>  - If fails, try to reserve X below 4G (swiotlb need to stay below 4G).
>  - If fails, try to reserve X from MAXMEM top down.
>
> It's more transparent and user-friendly.

ok with me.

But looks like last time Vivek did not like this idea.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ