linux-kernel - Re: x86/kdump: crashkernel=X try to reserve below 896M first then below 4G and MAXMEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171023020426.GA3240@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:04:26 +0800
From:   Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To:     Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:     "kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: x86/kdump: crashkernel=X try to reserve below 896M first then
 below 4G and MAXMEM

On 10/21/17 at 12:20am, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Now crashkernel=X will fail if there's not enough memory at low region
> > (below 896M) when trying to reserve large memory size.  One can use
> > crashkernel=xM,high to reserve it at high region (>4G) but it is more
> > convinient to improve crashkernel=X to:
> >
> >  - First try to reserve X below 896M (for being compatible with old
> >    kexec-tools).
> >  - If fails, try to reserve X below 4G (swiotlb need to stay below 4G).
> >  - If fails, try to reserve X from MAXMEM top down.
> >
> > It's more transparent and user-friendly.
> 
> ok with me.

Thank you!

> 
> But looks like last time Vivek did not like this idea.

>From the old discussion I remember Vivek was fine with this patch:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/15/601

Thanks
Dave