linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v7] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for SEA/NMI notification type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171022103951.52oqakwztrhim6nu@pd.tnic>
Date:   Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:39:51 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v7] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for
 SEA/NMI notification type

On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 06:06:10PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
> Thanks a lot Rafael's applying.
> Both for me is OK.

You should never agree if a patch has the SOB chain wrong. It might
sound trivial and not important for your current purposes but proving
the origin of a patch and how it found its way upstream can be critical
sometimes, in legal context.

So please pay more attention to the SOB chain in the future and don't
slap/change tags. They're not there for fun.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--