[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171023093054.GG32228@amd>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:30:54 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cphealy@...il.com,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 1/1] platform: Add driver for RAVE Supervisory
Processor
Hi!
> > drivers/platform/Kconfig | 2 +
> > drivers/platform/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/platform/rave/Kconfig | 26 ++
> > drivers/platform/rave/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/platform/rave/rave-sp.c | 677 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> First of all, why do these live in drivers/platform and why don't use
> the mfd subsystem to implement this driver (instead of rolling your own
> mfd-implementation)?
Sending contributors around like this is quite uncool.
1st, it should not matter much in which directory the driver lives.
2nd, there's no reasonable way for contributor to proceed if he gets
"stuck" between two maintainers.
Can you discuss with MFD maintainers, and provide clear guidance?
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists